Israeli soldiers stand next to demonstrators holding a banner in memory of Rachel Corrie
File photo shows Israeli soldiers standing next to demonstrators holding a banner in memory of Rachel Corrie, a US activist run over by an Israeli military bulldozer during a demonstration in Gaza in 2003. An Israeli court on Tuesday rejected all claims of negligence in a civil lawsuit brought by the Corrie's family © Musa al-Shaer - AFP/File
Israeli soldiers stand next to demonstrators holding a banner in memory of Rachel Corrie
<
>
AFP
Last updated: August 29, 2012

Israel court rejects civil suit over US activist death

An Israeli court on Tuesday cleared the military of any responsibility for the death of US activist Rachel Corrie who was killed by an army bulldozer in 2003, rejecting a civil suit filed by the family.

The ruling sparked an angry reaction from the Corrie family, with Rachel's mother, Cindy Corrie, accusing the Israeli authorities of a cover-up.

"The state has worked extremely hard to make sure that the full truth about what happened to my daughter is not exposed and that those responsible for the killing are not held accountable," she told reporters after the hearing.

And a British peace activist who witnessed her death first hand, insisted it was "inconceivable" that the driver of the bulldozer did not see her, as found by the judge.

"I reached the conclusion that there was no negligence on the part of the bulldozer driver," said Judge Oded Gershon at the District Court in the northern city of Haifa.

Corrie's death, he said, was the result of "an accident she brought upon herself."

"The deceased put herself into a dangerous situation, she stood in front of a giant bulldozer in a place where the operator could not see her. She did not distance herself as a reasonable person would have done," he said.

According to eyewitness accounts, the 23-year-old was killed by a military bulldozer in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on March 16, 2003.

At the time, she was acting as a human shield with a group of activists from the pro-Palestinian International Solidarity Movement to prevent troops from demolishing a house.

The verdict echoed the findings of an internal investigation by the Israeli military in 2003 which was concluded just four weeks after her death and cleared troops of any responsibility, saying the bulldozer crew did not see Corrie.

Following the hearing, the family vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court.

"The verdict is based upon distorted facts and could have been written by the state's attorney," their lawyer Hussein Abu Hussein told reporters as Corrie's father Craig stood by stony-faced while her mother looked heartbroken and close to tears.

Cindy Corrie said the family was "deeply saddened and deeply troubled" over the verdict.

"We believe that Rachel's death could and should have been avoided," said the white-haired American, her voice breaking with emotion. "We knew from the beginning that a civil suit would be an uphill battle.

"This was a bad day, not only for the family, but a bad day for human rights, for humanity, for the rule of law and for the country of Israel," she said.

-- 'Inconceivable the driver didn't see her' --

-----------------------------------------------

Tom Dale, a former ISM activist who was 10 metres (33 feet) away when Corrie was crushed, insisted it was not possible that the driver did not see her.

"On 16 March 2003, Rachel could not have been more visible: standing, on a clear day, in the open ground, wearing a high-visibility vest," he said in a statement emailed to AFP.

"It is inconceivable that at some point the driver did not see her, given the distance from which he approached, while she stood, unmoving, in front of it."

The ISM said the court's verdict was a "travesty of justice" but "not exceptional".

"As a rule the Israeli legal system provides Israeli soldiers impunity to commit murder," it said.

Craig Corrie expressed similar sentiments.

"We've seen from the highest levels of the military that they thought they could kill people on that border with impunity," he said.

The family first launched their civil action in 2005, for a symbolic sum of $1, plus costs, but court hearings only began in March 2010.

Senior Palestinian official Hanan Ashrawi denounced the verdict as "a miscarriage of justice" and said the judge had ignored "overwhelming proof that Rachel was deliberately murdered."

"This proves that once again, the occupation has distorted the legal and judicial systems in Israel, and that the lack of accountability for its violence and violations has generated a culture of hate and impunity," Ashrawi said.

She also lashed out at Washington over its "deafening" silence, saying it made the US administration complicit in Israel's crimes.

US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said she understood the family's disappointment, but added: "It's probably not productive to get into the middle of a legal process that may be ongoing."

A spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Corrie's death "an unnecessary tragedy," but said the court ruled in accordance with the evidence that "the Israeli side was not responsible, and on the contrary, if there was irresponsible behaviour -- it was by the activists."

He also rejected the criticism of the Israeli legal system levelled by Corrie's family members, saying they were "not objective" and that "there are numerous cases where the judicial branch rules against the executive branch."

Corrie was killed at the height of the second intifada or uprising (2000-2005) and quickly became a symbol of foreign support for the Palestinian cause. She was the subject of a 2005 play based on her emails and diary.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Stay Connected
twitter icon Twitter 10,187 linkedin icon LinkedIn 349
facebook icon Facebook 67,549 google+ icon Google+ 250